#Shandan Contest #SONY Sony A7R3 Digital Camera Start Experience Report
Xiao Bian Note: Double 11 to buy half of the sun lost, # # Sun single contest hot strikes, smashed hands have opened a box! IPhoneX etiquette waiting for you to win, submissions that get extra 100 gold coins, as well as original innovators exclusive rewards, App can light submission, details poke here.
This article did not sample, this article did not sample, this article did not sample
First of all, I admit that I am an impulse consumer, but I am not a cable powder, so I do not believe in recharge type consumption.
It's very interesting that I'm not a cable powder and I always spit on Sony, but I've spent a lot of money on Sony's purchases, from CD players to MDs to headphones to cameras to game consoles to TV sets. And I like to buy flagship or flagship products, such as the NE20 at the time the CD player was bought, and it is also the flagship of the last generation. Sony used to have good technology, good design, and technical design complement each other. Now Sony always feels that the technology is still good, the design is not satisfactory, and too much use of technology to make up for design flaws.
I prefer Apple to brand preferences, and I feel that Apple is more like Sony. But what's interesting is that apart from purchasing a 160G iPod Classic for yourself 10 years ago, you never paid for Apple's products at all other times...
In fact, my last article on GX85 mentioned that I had booked the A7R3 at the offline store. However, within a few days after the article, I cancelled the reservation.
Because I found that China Merchants Bank credit card store is more cost-effective! The 12th period is interest-free, although it is booked at China Merchants Bank, but the seller is the Sony official. Knight is Sony's platform for China Merchants Bank. Whether it is the open ticket or the 400 contact phone number is Sony's website. 23999 If you take a 12-month instalment, then just use the 24,000 online banking to find an annualized 4.5% interest rate, get 2,000 yuan each month for repayment, and get close to 600 interest rates in one year. However, I did not know that I had failed to pass the Aunt Zhang, JD was passed twice, even with 3000-211 coupons can also be considered historical low prices ... ... sometimes feel that the news on Zhang Aunt really is a fan.
The confirmation e-mail received by the e-mail is sent from the official Sony Store mail. 
Well, Tucao ends and writes the text.
After living with Sony for nearly two years, I took Sony's family out at the end of last year and started using the GX85. It has to be said that M4/3 is very easy to use and the experience is invincible. The GX85 has beaten Sony's Dafa family. However, the picture quality is poor, iso200 started, and the shadows are all noisy.
Near the end of the year, the discovery still needed a full camera. Sony Nikon, which has been used before, belongs to a machine with very good latitude. I have been accustomed to pulling back after exposure. And Panasonic cameras used more, instinctive can not accept non-touch screen non-flip screen camera. Originally prepared to select Canon, because several companies that provide full-service, Sony, Nikon, I have used, Leica can not afford, want to choose among the remaining Canon, Pentax. K1 machine is good, the silver version is faith and good-looking, but the lens selection is still pit than Sony, took the lead pass.
Then there is Canon, and the 6D2 tolerance is impressive. The phase-to-focus coverage is impressive. Although the dual-core focus is invincible, the flip screen design and the touch screen experience are also very good, but the disadvantages are very obvious. The 5D4 is all right, but there is no flip screen. Touch screens without a flip screen are even more boring than flip screens without a touch screen.
Finally tangled for a month, always thinking about whether to buy the D850 and return to Nikon. When it comes to Nikon, if the D750's focusing range is bigger and the screen is a touch screen, then I definitely choose the D750.
In fact, I had already thought about it at the time. If I selected Canon, I got a handful of friends or a drying list, and I must be ridiculed to ask for food: "Sony's body is a standard straight male cancer. Settings, data parameters strong invincible, but the software is forced to feed."
Then a7R3 was released, and then I tried to find a lot of problems before I found out that I had to improve, and then I made a reservation...
The following picture is for my own.
Actually, I had a role in last year's sunbathing to collect information on whether or not you have any questions about R3. I can write it in this article, but the previous one was estimated because it is a model of M4/3. Attracting, no one asked questions about A7R3, so this article can only be written based on my own ideas. I try to pick something that is currently relatively small on the web to write, mainly to write about the difference between A7R2.
Write first, because I have only 24-70 za of the FE lens on hand, so the photos I took were taken by the 2470ZA. So there is no sample in this article. After all, the head of Zeiss's blue flag is actually a big dog's head = =
Shipments are delivered by SF Land. I sent it at 5 o'clock on the 9th, Shanghai Pudong to Pudong, Shanghai. It arrived in the morning on the 10th.
However, Shun Feng actually said that he would go to Fengchao to mention cabinets and would not contact me...
Basically there is no buffer protection after dismantling, two small bubbles, but fortunately the appearance of the box is not damaged.
Box and sending card.
It's all this way, everything includes the body, shoulder strap, battery, charger, charger power cord, type-c cord, and instructions. It was discovered that R3 did not have the promotional paper of Phase Capture One, so I initially thought that Sony did not cooperate with them...
Let's talk about the accessories, R3 has a big improvement over R2 is that the battery replaced the A9 FZ100 battery replaced with a series of heirloom FW50 used for many years.
Just for me, there is a FW50, which was not found before selling the machine. Later it was turned in the moisture-proof cabinet.
Compare the size.
It can be seen that the FZ100 is one lap larger than the FW50 regardless of its length, width and height. So Sony can claim that the new battery can provide 2.2 times the original battery life.
Because the battery has increased in size, the charger's socket is not directly on the charger, but another line is dragged.
The fuselage line was actually replaced with the Type C line... Although this may be the future trend, this is also the only device of my family to use Type-c, and no spare line is available. What is the crudeness of the original factory line?
Send 32G card. Reading 300MB/s and writing 299MB/s is really strong. Of course, I didn't use the computer to test the speed and the nominal speed of this card, because this speed has already exceeded the speed of my USB 3.0 card reader...
SDXC II card, so a row of "teeth" on the back.
The front of the fuselage is almost the same as the A7R2. What's the difference? The slope of the shutter button is slightly higher, and it's the same as a9.
The reverse change is relatively large, that is, remove the a9 of the left shoulder turntable.
A7R2 began to use EVF T* coating. However, there is no use for x.
a7R III mark.
The right side is where the most changes occur. The original AF/MF, AEL lever was split into two buttons and moved away. From my habit, I think it is quite good. The original lever is not particularly easy to use.
The joystick used to replace the lever is used to select the focus point and can also be used to control the direction in the menu. On the feel, to tell the truth can not be perfect. Although Sony has made the center of the rocker an arc, the fingers cannot be embedded. There is a circle of protrusions on the rocker. It can be seen that Sony wants to use this circle of protrusions to increase friction. However, the fact that you use it slightly longer will make your fingers feel pain.
From my point of view, a rocker that is concave and surrounded by a protruding finger is bound to want fingers embedded in it. But the four protuberances on this machine are so immortal that just leaving a space between the palm and the rocker increases the pressure. And because the rocker can be pressed down, in order to prevent misoperation, it is not possible to apply pressure from the top downward, and it is not convenient to push and pull the rocker, and the rocker can only be moved by the friction between the finger and the rocker. At present, I have not found a place in the menu that I can use to customize the joystick. I don't know if I didn't find it or didn't really, but I hope that Sony will be able to customize the joystick. I'm sure to turn off the function I press. ......
Specifically speaking, it's not clear, it's best to try it out for yourself.
The video button was moved to the lower right corner of the EVF. I like this change more conveniently and it is not easy to touch it.
The original video key was changed to the SD card slot switch.
Finally supported dual cards. However, Sony's thinking is still very strange, even the above is slot2, the following is slot1.
Slot2 does not support sdxd ii but supports memory sticks...
The top of the fuselage does not seem to change.
There is only such a lens on hand, and it is quite harmonious after it is installed.
Although this one is rotten (it is really bad), there is a small blue standard.
The interface and a9 ratio, a network port, a type-c port.
Although I have always complained that Sony is very bad except for cmos, Sony still has a good one. USB charging can be used to recharge. To know that many friends of the machine support usb charging, but charging can not be used at the same time.
The hot shoe is still Mi interface, Sony is MI boy?
In fact, personally, I still like the original i-ISO interface. The two Sony lights I have are the i-ISO interfaces. However, the camera's hot shoe, in addition to the hot shoe in addition to other occasions also play cold boots, to install some other accessories.
The F43m is too big.
F20m is too thin.
Or TT350 is the most suitable.
Overall, the appearance of a7R3 is to remove the a9 of the left shoulder turntable, and in the operation and a9 is also a level.
A boot is the basic setting, habitually put my paws to the screen. Then think of 丫 support touchscreen ......
Sony's menu is like this anyway, setting the logic a shit.
For example, there is one page as follows:
Please guess what does the last three mean?
At first I thought it was to choose dual slots for storing content and the like.
Clicking and opening is actually a custom storage shortcut key setting...
What's more frightening is that the media on the last page was actually related to fast storage, and I didn’t read the instructions yet...
The menu changed the new menu of a9. There are 6 categories. Below each category there are many small categories. However, it was totally unreasonable to completely ignore the logic used by Sony to classify it. I first thought that the first category was photography settings, and the second column was camera settings, but all the custom settings were in the second column... 
The following subcategories of each category can't be selected quickly. What's worse is that if you accidentally switch the subcategories when you switch subcategories, congratulations, the previous pages should be restarted.
Sony's menu logic is probably like this:
Use the left and right to switch the main menu and then switch up and down into submenus. The sub-menu flips the pages left and right, and the items between the sub-menus are switched up and down. Looks good and can quickly switch between submenus. However, if you accidentally press the submenu, it will cut into the main menu. Then if you accidentally press the left and right buttons at this time, the previous submenu page will not be saved, starting directly from the first page. Shaoxia please come back.
Obviously just like Panasonic or Nikon, let the main menu and submenus are made vertical, and then add a menu memory on the line, for so many years why Sony still can not learn.
Now that you have talked about the instructions, take another note.
Sony's manual, the directory is useless, it is useless to want to turn over directly. What to look for can only go to the index.
why?
Because Sony’s manual arrangement logic and menu logic are completely different! The order is not the same!
If you see something in the menu that does not know what ghosts, you do not know where to look! 
OK, until you are familiar with the instructions, you will find that some parts of the middle and latter parts deal with the menu.
But in fact, it is a simple term to explain, want to see the complete or continue to turn.
I don't understand, is it okay to integrate the two logics?
But fortunately this menu has a page that is customized.
I just added two trials and added a total of five submenus. You can arrange them according to your own thoughts and put them into the usual ones.
Quickly flipped down the menu and found that white balance has a more priority setting.
There are three kinds of settings that can be set: standard, bad environment, and white.
For so many years Sony has realized that its color is problematic. Sony Yellow is not just a domestic user, and many overseas users have also mentioned that Sony does not look good. Including a7R3 overseas release also made special mention to optimize the skin color. I don't know what this white balance preference is. Anyway, I took my hand in the room and tried it. I didn't see the difference in the camera...
The new EVF is really great. When I used M2 and R2, I basically didn't use EVF because I didn't feel comfortable. But the new one, a word, cool!
Compared with the GX85, the gap is too obvious.
Of course, the difference between the CMOS size and the GX85 is also obvious, and four times after all.
The R3 has touch screens like the a9, but this is all 2017, and it doesn't even support multi-touch... In general, it's still not as good as it used to be.
Although I have been swaying Sony's body control logic, I would like to boast about the good place to do it. Because the Sony EVF is in the middle of the fuselage, so the face is particularly vulnerable to touch screen when using evf. One item in the menu is the option to touch the time of use. The touch screen activates the touch when the screen is used. The touchpad activates the touch when using evf.
However, I still want to tell you if it's not for me to try it. Who knows what a touchpad is.
In the case of wide-area focusing, the direct rocker cannot select the focus point. But this time you can touch the screen first, select a focus point with touch, and then you can use the joystick to select.
In fact, I just bought the a7R3 for the joystick + touch screen. The joystick was slightly lower than expected. The touch didn't hold much expectation, and it was OK to use it.
There are some other easy-to-use settings:
The fuselage can choose to switch between focus and so on when switching horizontally, but it seems to be not very good to be honest.
Just like a9, you just need to pull a little bit off the screen and the evf/screen auto-switching stops. This is still very good, to avoid misuse, and it can be used as an automatic switch shortcut. Did the original a7R2 and a7M2 seem to be missing, or did I never find it before?
Most of Sony's full use of Sony's writing speed before the use of hatred. In fact, how much slower a7R2 write can understand, after all, raw +jpg is close to 100M a photo. The card writing speed that many people use is 100M/s. But the saddest and most important thing is that when you write it, you can't watch playback or enter the menu!
a7R3 finally solved this. When you write, you can play back or enter the menu. However, there are still many settings that cannot be changed in the menu. Anyway, at least it's better than the original dry eyes.
Write speed and card are very large. Trying to send a random card is indeed much faster than my original SDXC I. Of course, the main write-up speed for this initiative is 60M/s...
The two left sides are my original cards, which are read 90 to write 60. The left-most Toshiba small green card was bought by D600. At that time, they bought two 32G cards, which was quite enough. Now that 32G is not enough, the times have changed.
Sony read 300 on this card and wrote 299M/s data, which is the same as XQD. However, the price is the same as XQD. Basic is the 32G 500, 64G 1000, 128G 2000.
This is Sony's 299 card, the shooting mode is uncompressed 14 bit raw continuous shot hi, pay attention to see the upper left corner.
This is a card created by Transcend 60. Think also quite normal, 42 million pixels of uncompressed RAW about 80 M, plus 10-20M JPG, a photo of the basic 100M or so, this number has been compared to see this card write speed is also higher ... ...
In contrast, the 12 bit raw compression mode can shoot for about 10 seconds, about 100 shots at a time. During the shooting process, about 40 sheets can be written in the same period. There are approximately 60 cards in the cache.
The writing speed is probably like this, much faster than the 14-bit continuous shooting.
Speaking of continuous shooting, I had to vomit the instructions again. I want to know how many FPS are Hi+, Hi, Mid, and Slow. Why isn't this even in the manual? ?
This uses a camera to guess it? ?
And say that good use of modes other than Hi+, can be displayed on the screen, why do I use Hi to black screen, Hi+ instead of black screen?
Here is the Hi+, in fact I have been shooting, you can see the left side of the cache progress bar, the last black screen is because the cache is used up, cut into the slow mode.
But this time it is also practical mechanical shutter. No black screen is completely because the playback of the photo is shown, although I did not open the automatic playback at all...
Forget it, don't give it up. Sony didn't say anything in his own manual, so he tried it on his own.
Uncompressed 14 bit raw, 3.5 seconds can shoot 31, about 8.85 FPS, far beyond my expectations. However, because the file is too large (80M+), the cache can only save 30 or less.
There are compressed 12 bit raw mode, 71 shots in 7 seconds, counting a little error is almost 10FPS. This is the mechanical shutter used, because I can feel the machine shaking.
When using the electronic shutter (the option of using only the electronic shutter, the last silent mode was not found), 51 shots in 6 seconds, and 8.5 FPS.
What kind of ghost is the electronic shutter even lower than the mechanical shutter? Obviously, the electronic shutter of the specification table is 10fps? So I tried the next 14 bit raw, the mechanical shutter is faster than the silent mode.
After I repeatedly burned the 1500+ shutter, I felt that the machine was very strange. Uncompressed continuous shooting sometimes reached 8 shots, sometimes only 5 shots... I still didn’t find out the rules, so I gave up and waited. Followed by someone to study it and say it.
At the same time, it is better to support flash with continuous shooting.
The summary of the continuous shooting section, a7R3 continuous shot is difficult to say perfect, but it is also very good.
14 bit raw, at present, I can try to reach the speed of nearly 9FPS, which is consistent with the D850's speed after it is installed on the handle. However, due to the problem of cache space, continuous shooting can also shoot up to 30, 3-4 seconds, which is a lot worse than the D850. In contrast, the D850 is equipped with a chicken blood after the handle is really strong ... 9fps continuous shooting, 51 14bit cache. What I really want to say is that the D850 will have a victory and defeat. The a7R3 is even easier to achieve 9FPS continuous shooting speed, D850 is strong in the cache.
12 bit raw, 10FPS can be achieved with a mechanical shutter. Although it is a loss of raw, but in many occasions (such as weddings) loss is not bad at all. And the 12 bit raw file size is small (more than 40 m), which also greatly improves the cache space. Can continue more than 100 sheets, this number is enough for many occasions.
Let's try Sony/Nikon Chief and try to find out. The first picture is the original appearance.
The second picture is underexposure 3 and then pulled back. The lack of exposure to 3 gears is completely stressless for Sony's machines.
Of course, the specific tolerance is not to Sony's 15ev, I pull the hen, this must wait for dxo to test.
Next is the sensitivity test. My hand on the left is to see if the skin color changes under high sensation. The upper right side is almost the same as the "electricity" above the box. There are shadows on the other side, there are colors, there are details of the box. The lower right corner is mainly used to see the focus of 100% of the details. However, when it is actually shot, it is a little shaken. There are a few pictures that are not necessarily in focus...
At the same time, I opened all the maps with Phase One, turned both sharpening and noise reduction to 0, and then outputted them as jpg. Then in the PS, the two parts to be intercepted are copied and copied to another layer. Then, after changing the original layer to a graph with a length of 800, the previously copied layer is moved back. So as long as these graphs can be viewed with a 800px horizontal resolution, the right two tiles are the standard 100% screenshots.
Originally, I was hoping to let people really see 100% of the screenshots. However, the ideal is good and reality is the backbone. When I was writing this article, I discovered that the default image resolution of Aunt Zhang's drying belt is 600 pixels long, and that is 750 pixels
Forget it, you'll see it...
As far as my standards are concerned, pictures below 3200 (including 3200) are still quite good. The small picture shows no obvious noise, and 100% of amplified color noise is not obvious. 6400 began to color noise is significantly more. The 100% screenshot of the 12800 is no longer visible, but it can be used if the noise reduction is done and the thumbnails can be used. 25600 is difficult to accept at first, and the small picture can also see obvious noise, let alone zoom in.
In terms of color, from 25,600 can see the hand has a clear cast color. This is true whether it is R2 or R3. But a7M2 basic iso 3200 began to cast color ... I personally feel that high color cast is even more disgusting than noise.
I'm sorry these two pieces I currently have no way to give a reply.
As far as the focusing system is concerned, I only have one lens on the 2470ZA. This lens itself is not a particularly fast lens, so it is more difficult to evaluate. And because the camera has only arrived, it hasn’t gone out yet. There are no models. There is really no chance to test the focus and eye control. However, during the test process, I really felt that the a7R3's single focus was a lot faster, and there was not much difference between the subjective feeling and the Panasonic DFD.
In terms of camera functions, I already knew that I wasn’t particularly large, and I’d like to see some of my professional media’s assessments better. However, I tried to record a video on my own, and the video tracking was also faster. Thanks to the addition of the touch screen, the video conversion focus is much faster and easier than before.
In the above two aspects, I will continue to use it further, if I have the opportunity to write another article. Including some real proofs, etc. will be sent together. Of course it was more likely because of laziness, so the pigeons fell out...
The first conclusion, the value, but may not be now.
After a simple day of use, it is still difficult to define the next machine.
The previous generation model a7R2 was a model with excellent advantages and disadvantages, but it was not particularly useful from my experience. I did not like it.
This generation of a7R3 itself is more like "a7R2 completion plan", squeezing a7R2 CMOS potential, better control, better focus, better continuous shooting, better battery life. If a7R2 is a single-function image quality machine, then a7R3 can be said to be a balancing machine: the original intention of quality, continuous shooting power, focus to force. Of course, there are still problems with a7R3, such as feel is still slightly worse, for example, although a lot of improvements are still full of feelings of the menu, such as one of the characteristics of the app actually has not.
By the way, when it comes to the app, everyone thought that the app was removed to improve the speed of the fuselage. However, the actual use of it does not improve how much the fuselage speed, boot or so slow.
So much to say, is a7R3 worth buying? In particular, is the difference worth 10,000 yuan more than a7R2, is it worth it? I personally think that the value of this one million, but everyone considered different points. That's right, CMOS is essentially the same, so a7R3 is not much better than a7R2. But no matter what other experience focus continuous shooting, etc., it is equivalent to completely replace a machine. How much of these values, everyone needs to consider. But for now, all currently available cameras in the market, including volume, image quality, latitude, continuous shooting, and focus, all together, the a7R3 may really be the most balanced machine.
How to choose a7R3 and D850? Personally think it can be. D850 lens group rich point, feel better, continuous shooting is actually stronger. The a7R3 can use adapter rings for higher playability, but the adapter ring still affects the focusing speed and picture quality. It seems that the video features of the a7R3 are slightly better than the D850 and need to be tested. Nikon's existing customers are not particularly recommended to switch to a7R3 directly on the D850. Canon users can consider buying an a7R3 and then switching to an existing Canon lens. Although the a7R3 and D850 will certainly form a positive competition, the worst is Canon. The 5D4 released last year was released as a balancer, but now it is all rolled over by Sony Nikon's two machines (in addition to the price). In accordance with the rhythm of a five-year, four-year update, it will be pressed for three years. Can only see the 5DS2 can not be able to pull it off.
How to choose a7R3 and a9? Up to you. However, as far as I am concerned, even for the average person, the price of a7R3 is slightly higher. The biggest difference between the two is actually continuous shooting/focusing and high image quality. It is true that many people say that high-resolution pixels are useless, and that computers must be excellent. But in fact high pixels can significantly improve late space and make it easier to cut. Relatively speaking, continuous shooting of more than 10fps did not really help me. Of course, which one is the final choice depends on the personal choice. Individuals think that Sony will control the shipment of a9, so that the price of a9 is maintained at about 2000-3000 higher than that of a7R3 in order to better classify the level.
to sum upa7R3 should be really a very good machine. Many media people said that this machine is more suitable for a9R, and I personally agree. The camera market in 2017 was very interesting. In the first half of the year, Sony came to the Taiwan a9. In the second half of the year, Nikon brought the D850. Then Sony released the a7R3. Even Matsushita released the G9 in hopes of grabbing a piece of meat in the high-end camera market.
If you can accept that the CMOS of this machine is still one of the previous generation, then this machine is really worth buying. If you think that the same machine at the end is not worth a big price difference, then continue to buy R2 for you, and now is also very accountable.
The so-called portable projector, also known as pocket projector, mainly through the 3M LCOS RGB three-color projector and decoding technology, the traditional huge projector is compact and portable, making the projection technology closer to life and entertainment.
Advantages compared with traditional projectors:
1. Small size, light weight, easy to carry.
2. Low calorific value and low noise.
3. The price is relatively cheap.
4. Most models support wireless connection through software projection.
Applicable fields:
1. Replace some functions of TV: some machines can have built-in CMMB function, or can be directly connected to the set-top box to put TV, which can be used as a 21-inch TV during the day and a 60-100-inch TV at night (Note: Because of lumen and resolution issues, lumens during the day If the degree is not enough, it must be projected at a close distance) to achieve the effect of home theater; it is convenient to move and break through the traditional film and television space. Even if you are on the mountain, you can also share today's TV series, movies, and MTV with your lover.
2. Business trip: Portable projectors are easy to carry because of their small size and light weight. When you need to display computer content or mobile phone content, you only need to connect the portable projector to achieve the demonstration effect.
3. Private space: For dormitory beds or small private spaces, in the absence of a computer, you can use a portable projector to project the content of your mobile phone to watch video pictures, etc., without staring at the mobile phone at close range.
portable projector mini,portable projector 1080p,portable projector camping,portable projector with speakers,portable projector for camping
Shenzhen Happybate Trading Co.,LTD , https://www.happybateprojector.com